Prostatectomia robótica e saúde digital: análise bibliométrica da colaboração e tendências científicas
Resumen
Objetivo: analizar el perfil bibliométrico de la producción científica internacional sobre prostatectomía radical asistida por robot asociada a tecnologías de salud digital, identificando evolución temporal, colaboración y tendencias temáticas. Metodología: estudio bibliométrico descriptivo con datos extraídos de la base Scopus. El análisis se realizó mediante el paquete Bibliometrix, incluyendo indicadores de desempeño, redes de coautoría, colaboración entre países, coocurrencia de palabras clave y mapeo temático. Resultados: se observó crecimiento reciente de publicaciones desde 2024, con dispersión editorial y red de coautoría fragmentada. La colaboración internacional se concentró en países con mayor infraestructura tecnológica. Conceptualmente, destacaron resultados del tratamiento y organización de la asistencia, junto con telemedicina, salud digital y eventos adversos. Conclusión: la interfaz entre cirugía robótica y salud digital constituye un campo emergente en consolidación, con implicaciones para la práctica, la educación y la investigación.
Citas
Abboudi H, Khan MS, Guru KA, Froghi S, de Win G, Van Poppel H, Dasgupta P, Ahmed K. Learning curves for urological procedures: a systematic review. BJU International. 2014;114(4):617-629. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.12315.
Aria M, Cuccurullo C. bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. J Informetr. 2917;11(4):959–75. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007.
Barbash GI, Glied SA. New technology and health care costs — the case of robot-assisted surgery. New England Journal of Medicine. 2010;363(8):701–704. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1006602
Basch E, Deal AM, Kris MG, Scher HI, Hudis CA, Sabbatini P, et al. Symptom monitoring with patient-reported outcomes during routine cancer treatment: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2016;34(6):557-565. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2015.63.0830.
Basch E, Deal AM, Dueck AC, Scher HI, Kris MG, Hudis C. Overall survival results of a trial assessing patient-reported outcomes for symptom monitoring during routine cancer treatment. JAMA 2017;318(2):197–8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.7156.
Bejrananda T, Khaing W, Veettil SK, Thongseiratch T, Chaiyakunapruk N. Economic evaluation of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. European Urology Open Science 2025;72:17-28. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2025.01.011.
Denis F, Lethrosne C, Pourel N, Molinier O, Pointreau Y, Omont J. Randomized trial comparing a web-mediated follow-up with routine surveillance in lung cancer patients. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2020;109(9). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djaa099.
Denis F, Basch E, Septans AL, Bennoune J, Urban T, Dueck AC. Two-year survival comparing web-based symptom monitoring vs routine surveillance following treatment for lung cancer. JAMA 2019; 321(3):306–7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.18085.
Di Maio M, Basch E, Bryce J, Perrone F. Patient-reported outcomes in the evaluation of toxicity of anticancer treatments. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2016 May;13(5):319-25. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrclinonc.2015.222.
Ficarra V, Novara G, Rosen RC, Artibani W, Carroll PR, Costello A, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting potency rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. European Urology. 2012;62(3):418–430. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.046.
Gadzinski AJ, Ellimoottil C. Telehealth in urology after the COVID-19 pandemic. Nat Rev Urol 2020;17(7):363–4. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-020-0336-6.
He J, Wei C, Su S, Luo Y, Li Y, Han K, et al. Frontiers and hotspots of 3D technology in prostatectomy from 1999 to 2024: a bibliometric analysis and visualization. Gland Surg 2025; 14(3): 436–50. Available from: https://doi.org/10.21037/gs-2024-483.
Kotronoulas G, Kearney N, Maguire R, Harrow A, Di Domenico D, Croy S, et al. What is the value of the routine use of patient-reported outcome measures toward improvement of patient outcomes, processes of care, and health service outcomes in cancer care? A Systematic Review of Controlled Trials. J Clin Oncol 2014;32(14):1480–1501. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2013.53.5948.
Mediavilla, B. G. et al. Feasibility and patient compliance to electronic patient-reported outcome collection using the Wave Health platform in prostate cancer care: a multicenter pilot study. European Journal of Oncology & Urology, v. 15, p. 102–110, 2025.Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2025.00066-9.
Ministério da Saúde (BR). Secretaria de Gestão do Trabalho e da Educação na Saúde. PET-Saúde: Informação e Saúde Digital. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2026.
Moreira MD; Machado DA. Desenvolvimento de mHealth para a promoção do autocuidado em prostatectomizados por técnica robótica [dissertação]. Rio de Janeiro (Brasil): Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro; 2024.
Nahas WC, Rodrigues GJ, Rodrigues Gonçalves FA, Sawczyn GV, Barros GG, Cardili L et al. Perioperative, oncological, and functional outcomes between robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy and open radical retropubic prostatectomy: a randomized clinical trial. J Urol 2024 Jul;212(1):32-40. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003967.
Naik N, Nandyal SR, Nayak SG, Shah M, Ibrahim S, Hameed BMZ et al. Telemedicine and Telehealth in Urology: Uptake, Impact and Barriers to Clinical Adoption. Front Surg 2022; 9:911206. Available from: https://doi.org/103389/fsurg.2022.911206.
Newman MEJ. Scientific collaboration networks. I. Network construction and fundamental results. Physical Review E. 2001;64(1):016131. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.64.016131.
Newman MEJ. The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2001;98(2):404–9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.98.2.404.
Nittas V, Lun P, Ehrler F, Puhan MA, Mütsch M. Electronic patient-generated health data to facilitate prevention and health promotion: a scoping review. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2019;21(10):e13320. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2196/13320.
Novara G, Checcucci E, Crestani A, Abrate A, Esperto F, Pavan N, et al. Telehealth in Urology: A Systematic Review of the Literature. How Much Can Telemedicine Be Useful During and After the COVID-19 Pandemic? European Urology. 2020;78(6):786-811. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2020.06.025.
Palma-Zamora I, Abdollah F, Rogers C, Jeong W. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Advancements in surgical technique and perioperative management. Front Surg 2022;9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.944561.
Rincon E, Monteiro-Guerra F, Rivera-Romero O, Dorronzoro-Zubiete E, Sánchez-Bocanegra CL, Gabarron E. Mobile Phone Apps for Quality of Life and Well-Being Assessment in Breast and Prostate Cancer Patients: Systematic Review. JMIR mHealth and uHealth. 2017;5(12):e187. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.8741.
Slusarenco RI, Mikheev KV, Prostomolotov AO, Sukhanov RB, Bezrukov EA. Analysis of learning curve in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy performed by a surgeon. Adv Urol 2020 May;2020:9191830. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/9191830.
Xu M-Y, Zeng N, Ma S, Hua Z-J, Zhang S-H, Xiang J-C et al. A clinical evaluation of robotic-assisted prostatectomy (RARP) in located prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology 2024; 204. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104514.
Zhao K, Li Z, Li C, Zhou Z, Xioa X, Wang W et al. Global research on robot-assisted prostatectomy: a bibliometric and visualization analysis. J Robot Surg 2025 Dec;20(1):113. Available from: 10.1007/s11701-025-03083-w.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2026 Revista Educação, Meio Ambiente e Saúde

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
TERMO DE TRANSFERÊNCIA DE DIREITOS AUTORAIS
Transfiro os direitos autorais deste artigo para a REMAS, assim que ele for aceito para a devida publicação eletrônica. Os direitos de autor incluem o direito de reproduzir na íntegra ou em parte por qualquer meio, distribuir o referido artigo, incluindo figuras, fotografias, bem como as eventuais traduções. O autor pode ainda, imprimir e distribuir cópias do seu artigo, desde que mencione que os direitos pertencem à REMAS. Declaro que este manuscrito é original, não tendo sido submetido à publicação, na íntegra ou em partes para outros periódicos online ou não, assim como em Anais de eventos científicos ou capítulos de livros.

